A question about the round-ups.
Right now, I'm writing these to be similar to the way I would talk about the comics I'm reading with other people who regularly read the titles.
Is this useful or helpful to people? Would it be more useful if I were to include more synopsis about each issue?
Let me know.
Is this useful or helpful to people? Would it be more useful if I were to include more synopsis about each issue?
Let me know.
posted by Aaron at 4:19 PM
5 Comments:
It's worked pretty well as is. It gives me the info I need to understand what's going on around the titles I collect and makes it super easy to avoid talk about the titles I do. That said, more synopsis might be nice. Of course, that's only if you want to devote the time to it. As I see it, that would just be icing on the (very tasty as it is now) cake. In other words, you're doing a terrific job and while more detailed synopses would be nice, they are totally up to you (It's like asking if I would like powdered sugar on the french toast you just made for me).
Keep the format the way it is. It's informative, gives a taste of what to expect, and yet doesn't give too much away.
I don't want to see a more detailed synopsis appear in these round-ups. I read several of the titles you regularly review and don't want to have that experience ruined by the revelation of any major spoilers, which would probably happen if you gave more of a synopsis.
I say keep everything as is. I like that I can scan pretty easily to see the titles I'm interested in and skip the ones I'm not. Plus, your summaries are usually just enough to help me decide if I want to pick the issue up or not.
You are doing a fantastic job. No need to fix something that is not broken.
Thanks for all the nice words, Os, Chana, Matt, Dave and the people who e-mailed me privately.
Well, as long as you guys are reading, I'll keep writing.
Thanks!
Post a Comment
<< Home